They're tired of the "takers"

LeBuffoon has called nonprofits "takers, not givers" and argues they need to chip in for things like police, firefighters and snow removal.

SJ Link

*****************************************************************************************************************************

If nonprofits are "takers" and need to pay their "fair share", why then doesn't LeBuffoon support the ACA's "individual mandate", which forces the "takers" who receive free healthcare in our hospital's emergency rooms to pay their fair share?  Huh, huh?




...and, just a friendly reminder, the "individual mandate" is a Republican idea first proposed by Newt Gingrich long before Obama became president.  Newt was tired of the "freeloaders" receiving free healthcare at the expense of the hard working, American taxpayer.  The "individual mandate" was Newt's way of forcing the "freeloaders" to pay their "fair share".

"The standard response conservatives give you when they cut welfare money is that taking care of the poor should be up to charities and the government should not be involved. Now, the governor takes that a step further and wants to tax the charities that supposedly would be filling in the gap because they too are 'takers'."

SJ Link