Another free speech case (Dixfield)
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Another free speech case (Dixfield)
Dixfield board drops Pickett over town meeting comments
“That was not his intent,” said Coffin [of the Portland law firm of Lambert Coffin]. “Any comments made by him [Pickett] at town meeting are protected by the First Amendment.”
Link to SunJournal LATEST NEWS
“That was not his intent,” said Coffin [of the Portland law firm of Lambert Coffin]. “Any comments made by him [Pickett] at town meeting are protected by the First Amendment.”
Link to SunJournal LATEST NEWS
T- Number of posts : 3862
Registration date : 2008-06-23
Re: Another free speech case (Dixfield)
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
From: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
From: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am1
Re: Another free speech case (Dixfield)
The Discussion Thread is interesting reading.
Link
Link
T- Number of posts : 3862
Registration date : 2008-06-23
Similar topics
» Selectmen and free speech
» Political Activity & Free Speech
» Jennifer Stowell Norris, does she believe in free speech?
» Free Speech is under attack in the River Valley
» In case you were not sure...
» Political Activity & Free Speech
» Jennifer Stowell Norris, does she believe in free speech?
» Free Speech is under attack in the River Valley
» In case you were not sure...
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum