latest TRR " editorial"

Does anyone have a clue why she posted the board of appeals regs? There's gotta be something going on. Kevin? if you're out there, I am sure you might have some insight.

Sincerely,

T. Ortez, concerned citizen

I'm sure there's a message behind this post. Any guesses?

funny, you and i think alike! really, there is something behind that posting that does not clearly meet the eye. On the surface one would go " huh???" but knowing the mindset of the TRR "editor" , it's gotta be something evil.

Just posted the same question under the Accountability post.

I think it's pretty clear that she's getting ready to attack (not that she does... EVER) somebody

I'm sure it's just educational :study: ... Stephanie did leave an opening

is she gonna make us watch Barney later?

I love you...you love me...we're a great big fam-i-ly...

or, in her version " I hate you, you hate me, you're a big cyBER-bully"

you crack me up...lol

Timeout,
There were already two vacancies on the board, so I doubt Stephanie's leaving is the issue.
She probably has a new vendetta against someone on the appeals board, and it's another veiled threat.
Maybe she just posted it to get us all going??????

Okay, I was just trying to be nice...lol...let's see, who's on the Appeals Board, Vashaw, McKenna, Saisi, Anastasio. We need one regular and two alternates...I though she liked Vashaw, I think Mark is friends with McKenna...Anastasio I don't know, I did know his dad or grandfather who recently passed.

I think Kevin would be the best to weigh in on this, but he probably won't because he has too much integrity (damn!).

Maybe Stephanie has a thought on it since she just finished.

I believe she is attempting to inform the people of the appeals process. If we had recently done anything, I would consider that she were indicating we made a mistake, but we havn't met lately. It is important to understand that the local appeals process requires a filing to be made within 10 days of an adverse decision.

xmashen wrote:I think Kevin would be the best to weigh in on this, but he probably won't because he has too much integrity (damn!).

I guess I should have rerad this thread first.... So much for my integrity

Actually, I don't know that commenting on why a person posts something is a reflection on integrity. I am not commenting on any issue that is likely to come before the board, and I have already indicated that I would recuse myself from any issue involving certain people.

I wonder if it is a response to the Enough is Enough thread page 3...

Now we know...........it must have to do with her new "appointment" as landlord/tenent spokesperson.