Anonymous??

My, my...............is that our River Valley Queen posting anonymously as "The Truth" (puke) on the Sun Journal? Check out the responses under the Firefighter recognition story.

Can you picture her acting as a town manager? SCARY!!!!!!!

Or, maybe "The Truth" is really R Ortez?

I warned her about using those exclamation marks!!!!!!!!

Three firefighters get recognized for their actions at a critical event. Had it been any other three, I am sure they would have done the same thing. It was a matter of being at that palce at that time. The fact remains, they did it. They did what had to be done. Therefore, someone in a position to make recomendations recomended thay get awards. The fact that the first firefighter may have violated some rule or something is totally irrelevent. Should the people presenting the awards have said "What you did was really good, but he may have done something wrong, so we aren't going to recognize you for what YOU did."? Then, the less than appreciative, and civil, boobs of the area start maliciously pushing their agenda, belittling the fire departments, and trying to show them in a bad light. We must truly feel sympathy for them, for how sad their lives must be. How worthless they must feel themselves. It's ok "the Truth", et al. Somebody loves you. It isn't me, but I am sure that somebody does.

I think it's a tag team, I heard one was visiting the other this morning. Notice how whenever facts are presented against "truth", "truth" never responds to them...weird, huh?

I couldn't believe the anger and hatred spewed forth by "truth". She (or she and he, since it may have been a joint project) need serious help. It was to me, truly "wicked witch of western maine" and her semi-flying monkey out for a full day of nasty fun.

oh, and let me add that the posts reminded me of a disgruntled teen with self-esteem issues that didn't make head cheerleader - full of pettiness and venom ("dear diary... today I attacked the RFD! they SOOOO deserve it!!! I HOPE THEY ALL DIE! gotta go now, Mom's calling me in for dinner... later!")

I'd recognize that manic typing and delusional thought (lying) anywhere.

delusional is an understatement. but honestly, this is one scary person!

I can hear the mad cackling from here!

Lol, I wondered if you all were catching the meltdown!

She just doesn't get it that she is posting things almost verbatim that she has posted online before, and is exhibiting the same behavior that she did while she was allowed to post here. She still thinks we can't possibly identify her and no one else can either.

for a " journalist" she has never learned to develop a writing style that isn't immediately identifiable, although i did detect another writer on the blog who one can only assume is RT (his style is butchier, if that's possible).

Compare a transcript of her night on this forum with tonight's SJ blog......................very similar. It's as though she's alone in a boxing ring and swinging at all who dare come near.

OMIGOD, it's like the Donnie and Marie show on acid! with JSN and RT posting back and forth (so easy to tell who is who). Assume (ok, i know, it makes an ass out of someone) that " real Truth " is RT .

No, I think she's in it by herself (selves?).

no, there is a stylistic difference (slight, since both are pretty much out of their gourds) but noticeable nonetheless.

let's just say I wouldn't want to live next door to either of them.

Sticks and stones may bruise my bones
But names are always useful

I'd say they started out working together this morning but by now it's looking like one lone soldier.

and we've all seen the picture of the " soldier". Not a pretty thought that our country's security might depend on such a creature.

It's getting a bit sad.

Admittedly, but not enough to feel too sorry

"....we should get together for a lot of beers sometime at the Shak and drive off drunk so we can videotape the harassment we will get after we leave."

"OK, we'll act drunk and then get in our cars and drive off so we can videotape the harassment."

These are two of her posts from yesterday's SJ.
It sounds like she'd like to bait the police, and that she thinks it's perfectly within one's constitutional rights to drive drunk. (And if stopped, then that's harassment.)
Sound thinking? Is this who we want representing OUR town?

I encourage her to drink alot of beers, then drive off drunk. I encourage her to videotape the "harrassment" that she will get. I would bet that the video never makes it to public eyes, though. Either way, an interesting concept. Win-win, I would say. What could she say (scream)? "We don't need a big police department when it only takes ONE of you to arrest me!"? Or "You are TARGETING me because you don't like what I have to say!"? I'm sure it wouldn't be "You are targeting me because I am drunk and driving!".

I also noticed that the SJ shut down the comment section for that article. So much for her appreciating the S J for their open forum for her free speech. I wonder what she has to say now?